SEMINARIILE DE CERCETARE ALE I.F.P.A.R (26.05.2022)
victorg, Monday 23 May 2022 - 00:00:00 //


Joi, 26 mai 2022, orele: 11-13
Conferențiar: ȘERBAN NICOLAU (I.F.P.A.R.)
Tema: Începuturile neoaristotelismului românesc. Teofil Corydaleu


SEMINARIILE DE CERCETARE ALE I.F.P.A.R (19.05.2022)
victorg, Monday 16 May 2022 - 00:00:00 //


Joi, 19 mai 2022, orele: 11-13
Conferențiar: Marian George Panait (I.F.P.A.R.)
Tema: Trei observaţii despre democraţie şi o propunere






SEMINARIILE DE CERCETARE ALE I.F.P.A.R (12.05.2022)
victorg, Monday 09 May 2022 - 00:00:00 //


Joi, 12 mai 2022, orele: 11-13
Conferențiar: ARNAUD DEWALQUE (Université de Liège)
Tema: Phenomenology, Descriptive Psychology and Conceptual Analysis


Husserl famously argued that Brentano’s descriptive psychology, unlike his own ‘pure’ phenomenology, deals with real mental states of empirical persons. In this paper, I challenge this interpretation. I argue that descriptive psychology yields a priori conceptual (or descriptive) truths. This suggests that its results are best captured in terms of conceptual analysis. I then distinguish four varieties of conceptual analysis—namely: decomposition, quasi-analysis, paraphrase and conceptual mapping—and argue that propositions yielded by descriptive psychology cover all four of them.


SEMINARIILE DE CERCETARE ALE I.F.P.A.R (5.05.2022)
victorg, Monday 02 May 2022 - 00:00:00 //


Joi, 5 mai 2022, orele: 11-13
Conferențiar: ADRIAN MIROIU (S.N.S.P.A.)
Tema: Cum alegem? Majoritate și unanimitate



Având ca fundal teoria alegerii sociale, prezentarea se concentrează pe analiza explicațiilor utilizării extinse, în alegerile de grup, a regulii majorității simple și celei a unanimității/consensului. Sunt analizate proprietățile acestor reguli și problemele pe care le ridică apelul la ele. Tradițional, filosofii au susținut că o diferență majoră între majoritate și unanimitate privește domeniul de aplicare a acestora: în timp ce unanimitatea guvernează alegerile constituționale, majoritatea le vizează pe cele post-constituționale. Făcând apel la unele rezultate formale recente, în prezentare se va argumenta că această poziție trebuie moderată.


REVISTA DE FILOSOFIE
victorg, Wednesday 13 April 2022 - 15:28:51 //





REVISTA DE FILOSOFIE
victorg, Thursday 24 March 2022 - 18:06:57 //





SEMINARIILE INSTITUTULUI DE FILOSOFIE ȘI PSIHOLOGIE "CONSTANTIN RĂDULESCU-MOTRU"
victorg, Wednesday 02 February 2022 - 07:17:50 //


pdf_ico.png Programul seminariilor Institutului de Filosofie și Psihologie "Constantin Rădulescu-Motru"


REVUE ROUMAINE DE PHILOSOPHIE
victorg, Thursday 20 January 2022 - 21:36:10 //




pdf_ico.png Sumar / Sommaire / Contents


INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE
victorg, Thursday 20 January 2022 - 11:41:38 //


INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE INSTITUTE FOR PHILOSOPHY AND PSYCHOLOGY
“CONSTANTIN RĂDULESCU-MOTRU”, ROMANIAN ACADEMY
pdf_ico.png ON THE OBJECTIVITY OF SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE. MODELS AND THEORETICAL REPRESENTATIONS OF STRUCTURE AND PROGRESS IN SCIENCE. TH. KUHN’S LEGACY

Sept. 29 – 3 Oct. 2022
Organizer: Mircea Dumitru, Ilie Pârvu, Marius Augustin Drăghici
Invited Keynoters (so far): Carlo Rovelli (Université d’Aix Marseille),Alejandro Cassini (University of Buenos Aires), Michael Potter (University of Cambridge), Timothy Williamson (University of Oxford),Paul Boghossian (New York University), Vasso Kindi (University of Athens), Bogdan Suceavă (California State University, Fullerton, CA, United States, Department of Mathematics)

From an epistemological standpoint, guided by Kuhn’s perspective on the structure and the dynamics of scientific revolutions, what stage are we in now? Are we still in the stage of “extraordinary science”, or in that of “normal science”? But in this last case, which is the “official” theory? Could it be the “String Theory”? Brian Greene says yes, Sir Roger Penrose says no (a different theory is expected to provide a more appropriate explanation for the new realities of contemporary science).

Other problems and questions within (the theorizing of) science shape the corresponding epistemological ones: what is the nature and structure of the quantum object? respectively what do we try to know at last – what does our epistemological concept of “reality” actually contain?; “the measure problem” (the role of the “intervention” of the methodological instrument in the referential system) also reveals issues such as the “Quantum Entanglement” and/or “Quantum non-locality” problem, the “Wave function’s collapse” problem, shaping the epistemological ones such as subject-object problem within (scientific) knowledge – where subject ends and where object begins (the problem of object being conditioned by subject), the problem of the category of causality (the reciprocal simultaneity and the temporal direction of causality), etc. 

We invite you to participate with talks related to the above topics but not strictly dependent on them. Beyond these, any attempt to answer some more general questions will be considered, such as: can one still work in the field of epistemology and philosophy of science without knowing and without being close to the instruments and the “laboratory” of sciences? How does the philosophical-epistemological standpoint still weigh in relation to the scientific-epistemological one in the elaboration of contemporary epistemologies? Are the limits of scientific knowledge the same as the limits given by the tools that became necessary to the researcher? What is now the relation between the dynamics of the epistemological conceptions and the evolution of science? What role may epistemological bias play in relation to the explanatory models required by the scientific theories developed today?
Presentations of relatively recently completed projects or arguments in favor of ideas that you are working on are also welcome.

The language of the conference is English. Those interested to participate are invited to send an abstract (250-300 words) to ifilosofie@yahoo.com or mariusdraghiciinstitut@yahoo.com (due-date 31th of August, 2022). The (final) results of the selection process will be announced until 15th of September, 2022. Each presentation will be allotted 50 minutes (35 minutes presentation, 15 minutes debates).


REVISTA DE FILOSOFIE
victorg, Thursday 23 December 2021 - 21:09:12 //





Go to page       >>